estenove hair transplant clinic turkey reviews

Estenove hair transplant clinic turkey reviews

Estenove hair transplant clinic turkey reviews


Higher Quality and Lower Prices
Many patients often ask the question of “Why are hair transplants so cheap in Turkey?” The main reason behind the cheaper hair transplant costs in Turkey is due to lower living and labor costs, which allows treatment prices to be more affordable than other European countries.


The Art and Science of Minigrafting


ABSTRACT: Minigrafts are increasing in popularity; they have replaced standard 4-mm grafts in many cases. Various factors influence follicle survival (handling and graft preparation) and affect minigraft visibility (hair color, character, and density).

Hair density measurements for the diagnosis and treatment of hair loss involve use of a device that quantifies the number of hairs in the transplant donor site as well as the balding area.

Attention to details in technique is needed for optimal results of minigrafting. The highest quality minigrafts necessitate use of smaller transplanted grafts of various sizes, in greater numbers and in random distribution.

The patient’s expectations as to both budget and time frame must be taken into account. Key Words: Hair transplantation, Minigrafts, Micrografts, Hair loss, Androgenic alopecia.

The exclusive use of minigraft transplants for hair restoration has created much controversy. The discord involves issues of optimal numbers, adequacy of coverage, and other factors.

A thorough understanding of minigrafting techniques can resolve many of the issues and lead to better and more predictable results.

estenove hair transplant clinic turkey reviews


Ever since the inception of hair transplantation,


patients have expressed dissatisfaction with the “pluggy” or “doll’s head” look which has been more common than most doctors care to admit. The initial answer to this problem was to develop one- to two-haired grafts-micrografts.

1-3 Micrografts may be used to soften previous grafting procedures or to create a natural hairline. Micrografts are gaining in popularity; in a utopian world, they would offer the finest form of hair transplantation. For most patients, however, an entire head of hair done with micrografts was impractical or unaffordable.

This problem led to the development of grafts that were intermediate in size between the 1-mm micrograft and the 4-mm standard graft, i.e., minigrafts. For many patients, a combination of minigrafts in most of the recipient area and micrografts in the hair line affords a practical and affordable means of hair restoration that mimics nature.

2-5 Some doctors whose experience has been with traditional, larger grafts believe that minigrafts do not give an appearance equal to what earlier methods offered.



Results obtainable with minigrafts are determined by many of the same factors that govern conventional grafts. The use of smaller grafts adds to the problems.

If these problems are not understood and addressed from the outset, the potential benefits of minigrafts may be nullified. For simplicity and clarity, the areas in which the differences between minigrafts and traditional grafts are most significant have been divided into general categories as listed below.

These categories are not meant to be exhaustive, but rather to reflect important concepts; the order of their listing is, in part, arbitrary. Some of the concepts presented below are not generally accepted principles as defined in standard texts on hair restoration, although most of them have been presented previously.

Few authors on hair restoration techniques and even fewer practitioners scientifically document variations in hair follicle survival in grafts of different sizes and with different methods of harvesting.

4-6 Our discussion, therefore, should be analyzed logically rather than scientifically, since many of our observations reflect issues of technique in the “art” rather than the “science” of hair transplantation.

estenove hair transplant clinic turkey reviews




A 4-mm round graft has seven times more surface area than a 1.5-mm round graft. Since the number of hairs in a graft depends on the surface area of the graft, one might expect to have to transplant seven times the number of 1.5mm grafts as would be required using 4-mm grafts in order to transplant the same number of hairs.

In practice, however, the number of minigrafts required to produce a similar result is much less than seven times larger than the number of 4-mm grafts. This difference in required versus expected numbers may have several origins.

The most obvious one is that a random distribution of fewer hairs gives a fuller appearance than a regular distribution of fewer clumps of hair.

Another reason for the observed difference may be a difference in the survival of individual hair follicles from the population of the donor hair with one method as compared to the other.

The loss of hair from one method of transplantation compared with the absence of hair loss with the other would affect the eventual hair densities of both.

It is acknowledged that all 4-mm round grafts undergo some degree of “doughnutting,” i.e., permanent loss of some of the transplanted hair follicles.”

From our experience, it appears that there may be little, if any, loss of hair follicles from 1-mm to 1.5-mm grafts due to “doughnutting.”

Few physicians count the numbers of hairs placed into recipient sites, and even fewer wait until the effect of telogen diffluvium has passed to count the numbers of hairs that grow from the grafts.4-7 Instead, virtually all physicians rely on a general impression of hair growth.

Contrast: hair character, hair color, skin color

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *